Published evidence
We name the publisher, link the original source, record the date, and state the sample or policy scope.
Each guide separates published evidence from interpretation, shows the source and review date, and turns the finding into a practical next step for one real location.
A published statistic can describe a population. It cannot prove what is happening at one location. Each guide labels the difference.
We name the publisher, link the original source, record the date, and state the sample or policy scope.
We record what was visible for a specific business, market, query, platform, and collection date.
We explain the reasoning, keep uncertainty visible, and require approval before customer-facing work.
These pages do not manufacture a bigger number. They explain what reliable sources show, what they do not show, and what a local team can measure next.
A practical review of official AI-risk guidance and platform disclosure rules, with a workflow for human review before publishing.
Review the evidence02Separate broad adoption claims from the business facts, search surfaces, and conversion signals a local team can verify.
See the measurement guide03Use current platform and regulator guidance to evaluate review quality, response coverage, recency, and policy risk.
Review the sources04Read population-level research with its scope and limits, then choose metrics that reflect real local customer actions.
Choose useful metrics05Start with Google's documented local ranking concepts, then build a repeatable location-level baseline instead of trusting recycled percentages.
Build a local baselinePublic research is context. LocalCMO helps a team compare it with location-level evidence, prepare an action, approve customer-visible work, and recheck the same signal.
Fix the query, area, date, and grid before comparing which businesses customers can find in different parts of a market.
Explore local rank tracking02Compare source, recency, response status, and recurring themes before preparing a reply or operational follow-up.
Explore review monitoring03Use customer questions, review themes, local events, and unanswered competitor topics as inputs—then require a human check before publishing.
Explore social media management04Save the prompt, engine, market, date, complete answer, and cited sources so a later recheck measures the same question.
Explore AI-search visibility05Keep the source, recommendation, edits, approver, and final status together before a change leaves the workspace.
See the approval workflow06Connect each decision to the evidence available at the time and preserve what changed for the next like-for-like review.
See the audit trailCheck a customer-visible gap, review the source behind it, and decide whether the proposed action is worth approving.
Customer-visible actions stay behind approval.